(bridge) Send note to Paul Prueitt . (SBF4. .)

We ask that comments and discussion on this series be made in the Yahoo groups from, eventChemistry.

SBF1 – Introduction to the Sowa-Ballard Framework

SBF2 – Ontological Primitives, derived by Sowa and Ballard

SBF4 – Mapping Viewpoints and Differences Between Viewpoints

The Sowa -Ballard Framework 3

Data regularity within the Ontological Primitives

We are considering the

Domain space = { E _l | l = 1, . . . , 100 }

described initially by 1900 individual data pieces

{ < a(0), a(1), a(2), . . . , a(18) > _l | l = 1, . . . , 100 }

This data is often to be entered into a file system designed to be converted into the OSI Knoweldge Operation System In-memory Referential Information Bases (I-RIBs) for fast and interoperable computations. We use the notation

< a(0), a(1), a(2), . . . , a(18) > _l | _i = a(i) _l

to be the i-th projection of the l-th framework, so

{ a(i) _l } = { a(i) _l | l = 1, . . . , 100 }

is the set of values that have been placed into the i-th cell across the 100 events.

The 18 cells are again:

{ process (IPO), script (IAO), object (IPC), schema (IAC), measure (IPU), definition (IAU),

participation (RPO), history (RAO), juncture (RPC), description (RAC), interaction (RPU),relativity (RAU),

situation (MPO), purpose (MAO), structure (MPC), reason (MAC), law (MPU), formalism (MAU) }

so the values for “process” are { a(1) _l }. The regularity of the data is then observed empirically.

(bridge) Comments can be sent to ontologyStream e-forum . (SBF4. .)