Friday, January 27, 2006
[148] ß [parallel discussion on
generative methodology (Judith Rosen)
[147] ß [parallel discussion on
generative methodology (Peter Krieg)
[368] ß [comment on four issues
(Richard Ballard)
Four Issues about Ontological
Modeling
On the issue of Polemics
Communication from Paul Werbos à [367]
Communication from Paul Prueitt
The following thread shows the type of polemics that occur as entities work to establish narrow agendas…
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebsoa/200510/msg00005.html
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebsoa/200510/msg00006.html
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebsoa/200510/msg00007.html
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebsoa/200510/msg00008.html
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebsoa/200510/msg00009.html
where
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebsoa/200510/msg00010.html
shows a type of behavior related to how when a business agendas conflicts with solid and clear thinking, the behavior expresses (as per the example)
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebsoa/200510/msg00011.html
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebsoa/200510/msg00012.html
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebsoa/200510/msg00013.html
one has to edit the URL to get all of this discussion, as it has been moderated
but
http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ebsoa/200510/msg00016.html
is where the business interests suggest that the contributor leave the Technical Committee. In this case, the contributor had far greater influence than the one with the narrow agenda.