[140]                             home                             [142]

Friday, October 22, 2004

 

The BCNGroup Beadgames

 

Background discussions on a proposed

Anticipatory Technology Challenge Problem

 

Center of Excellence Proposal

Challenge Problem

National Project

 

White Paper on Incident Information Orb Architecture (IIOA) à

 

BCNGroup’s offer in response to the War on Terror

 

(see also (mappingSocialDiscourse))

 

 

The problems faced by the American Administration are difficult ones.  The BCNGroup is offering, as of Thursday, October 21, 2004, a Challenge Problem in response to a Broad Area Announcement from ARDA. 

 

Our technology is designed to effectively and accurately inform us of who may be contemplating terrorism and what their geographical location may be.  

 

We believe that our technology will increase the measure of fidelity between what is information, that might be misleading or incorrect, and information that is correct.  As this occurs, we expect the foreign threat to diminish and the stress leading to fundamentalist expression, at home, to also diminish. 

 

In the New War, our task is to detect and understand memetic expressions that are targeting our way of life, without destroying our tradition for multi-culturalism and freedom of expression.  This task is difficult even if one knows who the potential terrorists are and where the threatening expression is coming from. 

 

Americans cherishe multicultural traditions. Our observation is that these traditions are memetically complex, in fact multiculturalism might best illustrate the expression of memetic complexes.  In these expressions, reconciliation of conflicts can occur by accepting the differences between expressed viewpoints as being natural and acceptable.  Memetic simplexes are more narrowly expressed as a truth that cannot allow alternative viewpoints.  As a consequence any attempted reconciliation process quickly becomes a conflict that can only be resolved by domination of one “side’ over the other “side”. 

 

By holding to principle, the simplex often becomes part of a justification for aggression.  When this occurs, the justification is reinforced by a rational appeal to basic principles.  The rationale is expressed in the selection of words by authors and this selection process involves the formation of mental events.  The consequences of our understanding how mental events form leads us to the development of anticipatory technology based on the measurement of the co-occurrence of semantic primitives defined in the substructural ontology.  The generative methodology for the development of substructural ontology is discussed in a thread of the glass bead game started October 21, 2004.

 

Many simplexes are able to exist without leading to un-resolvable conflicts, in spite of the natural reflex to express belief.  It may be that there is a more complex social belief that moderates the simplex.  For example, the current holding back on expression by the al Qaeda terrorist movement may be due to a radical fundamentalism embedded in something more complex.  The ability to control or moderate fundamentalism may be held within the mainstream Islamic community. 

 

These are only some of the difficult issues that will be better understood by mapping of themes expressed by social symbols in social discourse.  Centers of Excellence are being planned to engage interdisciplinary groups in the American academic community. 

 

We make the argument that such mapping of the social discourse has economic value as well.  Interests groups can stay in tune with currents topics within a large distributed community.  Product suppliers can harvest the social discourse and use this information to stock inventories, understand customer feedback and concerns.  The harvest of the thematic structure of social discourse is currently done with polls.  Orb constructions visualize the topics and themes in web based virtual communities.  In the preliminary results from Orb developed mapping of social discourse, visual icons indicate opinions.  Our claim is that these Orb construction when visualize and subject matter indicators, create a greater detail than polling methods achieve.  The automated develop of taxonomy is discussed in the InOrb Technologies bead game thread. 

 

President George W Bush has consistently argued that the War on Terrorism is a long-term struggle between civilized societies and a well-organized community of radical terrorists. 

 

Principle Observation: This source of threat is a complex system of social activities.  The development of the threat depends essentially on human communication.  The communication is required as a means to inform the various members of existing groups.  Terrors cells grow new membership from the large communities in which the terror community exists. 

 

The bits and pieces of terror-community text is acquired in real time, by the many web harvesting processes now in place (such as the system that has (hopefully) evolved form the NSC J-39 system) and can be used to know what the social discourse is within and between the embedded community cells.  This can be done immediately using the Readware software.  Moreover, the fidelity of the resulting map of terror discourse increases radically as the system is tuned to catch the nuances that characterize terror discourse. 

 

The ReadWare Orb constructions are small co-occurrence maps and exist at three levels.  The instrumentation is made at a letter 3-gram level, where the 3-grams are constructed stems.  It is worth noting that Readware has not be applied to Arabic discourse as yet, since the core team has not had the financial resources or client supporting this application.  The next level is composed of an aggregation of these 3-grams into constructions that have been specified in a semi-automated fashion.  The semi-automated process is to be demonstrated using 25 Aesop fables, and concept identification tests made over the entire collection of 312 fables. 

 

 

Figure 1: Readware stratification of informational bits

(Power Point at {++})

 

These aggregations of letter 3-grams are placed into a concept frame.  The concept frame can be realized as concept indicators with an additional constraint reflecting sets of ontological affordances discovered within the Readware stratified ontology and generative methodology.  The concept frame acts as a concept prime, and creates a higher-level abstraction than does a specific word level harvest of text.  This higher level of abstraction is also being appreciated in the applied of the generalization of the Readware-Orb generative methodology as applied to the co-occurrence patterns found in cyber attack scenarios (Stephenson and Prueitt, current work).