Thursday, November 17, 2005
Center of Excellence Proposal
à
( link to the Taos Discussion à [63] )
Hello Paul,
Paul Prueitt wrote:
This "ontological" reality to the invariance in language can be over written, as it often is in English. But in Arabic and some other language (perhaps the primitive languages) the invariance is enforced by a spiritual awareness of the use of words and parts of words.
Further
discussion about categorical collapse
and
word formation à [205]
I don't think the invariance are overwritten.
The invariances have gone to our sub consciousness. The processes being indicated by particular combinations are being taken for granted after countless repetition through experience.
As you know, being as close to Tom Adi's work as I am, I
have had a pretty deep awareness and a history of empirical observations with
his theory in mind. Just one example
that leaps to my mind is the use of the r-l combination in the English
language.
Try to find an English word that does not also indicate a
circular or recurring process of some type either imaginative, as in reluctant,
real or rule or physical as in world and recycle. The appearance within the words seems to invoke the corresponding
abstraction, thought or the referenced mental event in the mind and
imagination.
By the way:
I have been programming a Desktop Graphical Interface and downloadable framework. Do you think I could announce it through the BCN Group. It will be a usable Readware product for those with Windows XP,2k and 2k3.
A white paper is available. I would not mind for Miles Davis, John Sowa and others to read
the white paper, download the Desktop Graphical Interface and use the software themselves.
Cheers,
Ken